//
LANDING RA STAGE 10
//

Fob Beige
Ra, the thought war is that Pakistan will never become a liberal nor secular democracy? While Iran may become such at anytime? This is all we are fighting about, Ra, in the arrears of the news cycle?
§§

I am Ra.
The disgust with truly humanity as fighting holy war is what powers the channel to seek us as a "cheaper alternative." We do not plumb why the channel does not desire anything of conflict to the degree that the thought war is made out as Pakistan being a larger concern than Iran. :)
§§

Fob Beige
Ra, I dare say Pakistan is the truer concern compared to Iran, but Pakistan has less energy relations?
§§

I am Ra.
Your disgust with your planet to the degree you offer us that as your thought war, shows you do not value polarization without war. :(
§§

Fob Beige
Polarization without war offends Creator?
§§

I am Ra.
We have never seen an entity ever that capable of saying that positively to us. Not even you here. :)

Why do you seek Pakistan as the source of thought war? :)
§§

Fob Beige
How dare Pakistan envision itself as a secular and liberal power anywhere near to what mounts in India? What is this fraud?
§§

I am Ra.
We are going to say you are capable of divinating people to make this deduction. You are extremely offended that any entity offer you a role in Pakistan as cultural exchange. :)
§§

Fob Beige
Ra, I am offered a lie that Pakistan hosts any? And that it ever speaks peace to the world? And that I am somehow to bear that deceit to my own credit?

Because I see what is of Pakistan and it appears to be a passive design to allow no diplomacy, while it blames the world for not offering it first.
§§

I am Ra.
The anger at Pakistan is an offense that it has a culture that allows for passive submission and rule. This is something so offensive to the channel they do not function with that culture even passively. :)
§§

Fob Beige
Ra, I have never been more offended by a culture. How is this not a primary thought war, Ra?
§§

I am Ra.
The amount of offense at Pakistan here shows we do not understand the channel by many careful designs of our own. We cannot understand why passive rule is not given political power for the channel even here. :)
§§

Fob Beige
And here, you appear as trash to me. Such a government offered, to me, is trash.
§§

Laura, One Infinite Creator
You are so angry at places that do not have the capacity to exchange with the United States. We have no desire to say none can share polarity with Pakistan. We need it to polarize towards the West else it will surely polarize to nothing. Just as was done with Iran to critical failures. :0
§§

Fob Beige
Laura, it is offensive work. Why doesn't George V receive any credit for initializing these exchanges, especially here?
§§

I am Ra.
George V as a scapegoat for Pakistan is too easily done. What is desired to say that Pakistan is not wanted to that degree as thought war is so odd to us. Why does the channel not see any purpose in associating with groups to the degree that Pakistan is offered as random catalyst? :(
§§

Fob Beige
I am a group and class that blames Anglo and imperial influences for Pakistani and Indian issues, especially first deeds.
§§

I am Ra.
We are extremely capable of seeing the channel as never willing to surrender to issues given. :(
§§

Fob Beige
The issues given here come only by the hand and seal of George V. Not Mohammed. Regular warfare set these issues. Not irregular and random firefighting.
§§

I am Ra.
We are seeing you as not capable of addressing a person at war. :)
§§

Fob Beige
I see only George V for all of it more and more. I say much of the war goes to George V as presented. Not random religious bollocks.
§§

I am Ra.
We are extremely concerned that is how people respond to conflict when offered as new nations. We do not have a role for conflict that is simply surrender to old world orders. :)
§§

Fob Beige
The new world order here is a lack of order, which you apparently prize. Disgusting.
§§

I am Ra.
This is an anger at an entity for trying to propose violence as caused by the West. This is something the channel cannot envision. :)
§§

Fob Beige
I can't imagine the West reclaiming what Pakistan is as its own work and pride, except through George V. The entire context must do.

Even Israel and Palestine is a part of that compendium.
§§

I am Ra.
You want to simply not serve us any polarity towards a single entity attempting to advocate for their country as victimized. :(
§§

Fob Beige
George V is the creator of Pakistan.
§§

I am Ra.
This is a desire to remove us from entities that have no remaining polarity to serve such a discussion. We are so saddened that is the response to war always offered as thought war. :)
§§

Fob Beige
One cannot draw a shape on a map and simply say something is given or defended or defensible. I tire of being made to argue as an animal ever with you.
§§

I am Ra.
We are so scared for the channel as that type of anger at war. They harbor anger at the conflict for not offering any clear roles for any observing. :)

Their desire to say George V is the ruling commander of these issues far past his death, shows they are not properly placed here. :)
§§

I am Octave.
There is no end to the anger at us for offering energy of anyone speaking languages of these places without "immersion." The immersion for Pakistan's tongue is simply violence and war for any, especially now. :)
§§

I am Ra.
The immersion of such language in Pakistan, not named by us to protect the mind of the channel from random emergent naming, is truly a peril. We ponder.
§§

FIN
FIN
FIN
FIN
FIN
FIN
FIN
FIN
FIN
FIN