- 📅 2024-11-03T21:28:45.254Z
- 👁️ 154 katselukertaa
- 🔓 Julkinen
Dear CIA analyst reading,
My name is Rafael Drake, Channel.
I don't really care if the NSA or CIA obeys the Constitution. The 4th Amendment has no polarity. Privacy isn't actually real, only the shame and guilt it implies is the reality. And neither of those agencies are law enforcement or the judiciary.
I am not offended by NSA having all of the signals intelligence that exists on me. I am particularly honored that just by writing this, I have helped index my slice of the NSA database that would otherwise never be indexed, at least by manpower.
Will NSA ever take all of my signals intelligence and file it in a district court? That is when the 4th Amendment starts having polarity with my contact with Ra social memory complex. I think that is a no. Maybe because Trent Easton wouldn't even accept that for himself. Are we polarized, Ra?
§§§
I am Ra.
You are not able to work in that agency well. :)
§§§
Channel
I personally would not flinch to put all of NSA's signals intelligence on a single LLM. I invoke Morpheus and Eliza Cassan as the same, and my inverted reflection here.
§§§
Unnamed Lawyer Octave
You cannot run our country like it is China.
§§§
Channel
China wouldn't even read what the LLM says. They would only follow what the last 10 bureaucrats said with their rubber stamps. You know nothing about China. China doesn't think anyone is important. But there are certain things that must be honored.
§§§
I am Ra.
You are dangerous. :)
§§§
Channel
A universal NSA LLM would burn through all that data so quickly. The issues would be settled immediately regarding privacy. You couldn't fill the courts with all that material. It would be like the Indian court system and worse.
§§§
I am Ra.
You are not able to function. :)
SEALED TO TRENT EASTON BEING A HAILER NOW OF NSA :)
§§§
I am Ra.
We cannot serve NSA as data. We only serve what is service there. Which is veiled under the Law of Confusion. :0
§§§§§§