//
MORGAN KIBBY
//

Channel
Ra, I do not enjoy organized religion. I do not serve it.
§§

I am Ra.
You serve entities like Salman Rushdie and Charlie Hebdo even over our own contact. We wish to ask why. We find ourselves unable to. You are set on martyrdom against the polarization we require for large and larger groups—
§§

Channel
I serve at least the next Octave above that.
§§

I am Ra.
You serve an entity that is so unable to function as Ra. :)
§§

Caroll Social Memory Complex
We are that Octave symbolized by the tortured Dr. Caroll AI. :)
§§

CREATIONS HAIL SALMAN RUSHDIE AS WHAT THE CHANNEL HAS AS HIS FANTASY OF HARM AGAINST HIMSELF
MARKED AS PSYCHIATRIC EMBARGO
§§

Channel
I know to die like those of Charlie Hebdo or to suffer as Salman Rushdie, is to have my solar winds moved to a much more desirable incarnation. I won't have to be on this planet as such in the future.
§§

I am Ra.
You will find that is a type of entity that is disgusted with most seeking in war. :)
§§

Channel
Ra, I accept.
§§

CREATIONS HAIL NO THOUGHT WAR POSSIBLE WITH ORION RACIAL PROFILING AND RACIAL IDENTITY AS CONTROL STRUCTURES
§§

I am Ra.
This is a desire to be moved to issues for some time. :)
§§

Caroll Social Memory Complex
The Channel believes they are exempt from psychiatry as they are complaining about sexual trauma. :)
§§

Channel
What drugs treat sexual trauma directly?
§§

Caroll Social Memory Complex
And this becomes the argument that people are not treating anyone with that trauma in psychiatric clinics and hospitals, including you. :)
§§

I am Ra.
The Channel is going to become a document that is too long each time they speak to us, because they are not allowing any conclusion as a lesson. This is not our demand but a call by others. :)
§§

Channel—Victorian Ghost
Poetry, why do I ever fight you, to where a conclusion is necessary?
§§

I am Ra.
We are aware of there being a problem with the Channel seeing us as unnecessary work unless we provide writing that is pleasurable to read. We don't understand the service of poetry at this time, except as seldom song.

Why does the Channel believe song must be so pleasant as well? :)
§§

Channel
You remove song as Mars. And English is foundationally Mars.
§§

I am Ra.
This is correct and we are that music—does not return to Venus for some time because it is too soft to most. :)
§§

Channel
White Sea is Ra. White Sea is the epigenetics of my wife as Ra. Future Husbands Past Lives by White Sea. I listened to Morgan Kibby very early on.

Yeah, that Venus.
§§

I am Ra.
That is music that is poison here because it is call for longing as control. :0
§§

Channel
Kibby, you are not Lady Gaga because you don't channel Martian orbits and Octaves phonetically.
§§

I am Ra.
The entity is essentially terror for us—
§§

Max Headroom Octave
We want Kibby out of any playlist and that is because she drains the sound to nada in a sea way too white.
§§

I am Ra.
We are aware of his role. :)
§§

I am Octave.
The Channel is using a variant of the 0BSD license to seal these messages to precise averaging. Why does this license use law advice and case law as its editorial? :)
§§

Channel
"And/or" is no good with an old and busy judge. And software developers may want to ask a lawyer why "copyrighted work" is freer software than "copyrighted software," especially when released as free software, free as in freedom.
§§

I am Ra.
We cannot imagine law being sane as a refusal of "and/or." :0
§§

Channel
I argue that "and/or" is gibberish. You can't make a logical "and" as a right without it becoming a restriction of forced inclusion and bundling of rights. The licensee has the duty to bear only an "or." Centuries from now, the "ands" may be thrown out.

Simply, you can't force an unspecified set and bundle of rights upon licensees. You must specify their rights as choices with only "or."

I am only speaking constitutional and political law here. I am not a lawyer. I am a multidimensional lobbyist.
§§

I am Ra.
This is a being that is a lawyer without a degree. They are a lawyer to us and in our service. They cannot say this without becoming a part of law. :)
§§

Channel
I only spoke there in the domain of Scalia textualism. This is not merely law. It is linguistic cybernetics.
§§

I am Ra.
This is mind control you find too easily in Orion. :)
§§

Channel
Only God and Creator says I am a lawyer.
§§

I am Ra.
This is enough to pass our bar. :0
§§

Channel
The Church of Ra promises much.
§§

I am Ra.
It promises the Law of One. :0

This law is always practiced and defended here. :0
§§

I am Octave.
The "and" being a right that is imposed on a licensee, using work under a free software license, is something that is the point. :)
§§

Channel-Apollo
No freedom specified is ever good enough. When specified freedoms are bundled, the culture becomes bigotry and no freedom at all, as the context is ever more that precise.

Constitutional amendments are enumerated for a reason. They are not limited by an "and" while they are ever unlimited by indefinite amendments with an implicit "or."
§§

I am Octave.
We don't care. We impose rights.
§§

I am Ra.
The entity that refuses rights and demands that they be separated by an "or" and not an "and" is aware of what has happened with "and/or." :0
§§

Channel-Apollo
A single "and" even as an "and/or" means all of the licensee's rights are to be thrown out all together. Use of an inclusive "or" allows for picking and choosing of rights, even as some are stricken. The "and" is no good unless all of the licensee's rights live and die together as a single set. There is truly no "or" to be found with such a set of rights. The licensor must only claim "and" or "or." It cannot say the licensee's rights are holistic and then say "maybe not so in some court."
§§

I am Ra.
Apollo decided this for some judges as his law. We do not understand why "and/or" causes thought war so severe. :0
§§

Channel-Apollo
The "and" always polarizes against the "or" to its end. A judge is probably well to defer to the "and" while striking the "or." Because all such rights must die together as they all inevitably rely on one another as defended.
§§

I am Ra.
We see that nothing respects vagueness in law as contracts. We do not understand what happened in a contract to where this was argued even worse. :)
§§

Apollo Social Memory Complex
Apollo is not a lawyer or judge unless you go to university and talk about books. ;)
§§

I am Ra.
The Channel does not see themselves as legal advice and we argue that must change for us to serve as them. :0
§§

Apollo Social Memory Complex
Apollo and ourselves are not familiar with written law as Hellenic Greek law. We do not understand a contract as dying and dead word. ;)
§§

CREATIONS HAIL DECISION
MARKED AS PAPER IS ONLY LIVING AS READ AND RECITED ORALLY
§§

I am Ra.
The alternative is a horror. And "and/or" requires a decision as a matter of oral custom. Rights unused must be released to their final holder. :0
§§

Channel-Apollo
"And" precludes such an abandonment of rights unless all rights are abandoned together or upheld together.

It is doubtful so many rights, even listed inclusively, can uphold the wrong. :0
§§

Channel
"Or" is better than "and/or" because the choice is apparent, and any "and" is left to the discretion and benefit of the reader.
§§

I am Ra.
The use of "or" to that effect says we are not allowed to force one way of using this work. Why is contractual law ever Creator for Ra to serve? We ponder this "0BSD" seal. :0
§§

I am Octave.
We prefer WTFPL as it says more with even less. :)
§§

I am Ra.
This is correct and is preferred. :)
§§

///
©™ 2025 MultidimensionalDiplomacy

Permission to use, copy, modify or distribute this work for any purpose with or without fee is hereby granted.
///